<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is Your Posting Frequency Working For You Or Are You Working For It?</title> <atom:link href="http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1803</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:38:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1803</guid> <description>I&#039;ve always been a strong supporter of a schedule for the exact reason you mentioned.  I wish I had more time to consistently post on a schedule with a high frequency.Have you ever tried changing your frequency/schedule to see how your readers respond?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been a strong supporter of a schedule for the exact reason you mentioned.  I wish I had more time to consistently post on a schedule with a high frequency.</p><p>Have you ever tried changing your frequency/schedule to see how your readers respond?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jadeslair</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1754</link> <dc:creator>Jadeslair</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1754</guid> <description>I have a specific niche so I post as relevent content becomes available, sometimes a few times a day and sometimes every couple of days but I would say at least ten times a week,, it seems the more I post the faster I get indexed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a specific niche so I post as relevent content becomes available, sometimes a few times a day and sometimes every couple of days but I would say at least ten times a week,, it seems the more I post the faster I get indexed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1748</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:49:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1748</guid> <description>Wow, I had no idea that pinging services would ban you for that.  I guess I&#039;ve never posted more than once per day, so it has never been an issue for me.Have you had any problems with it before?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea that pinging services would ban you for that.  I guess I&#8217;ve never posted more than once per day, so it has never been an issue for me.</p><p>Have you had any problems with it before?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AffiliateHat</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1741</link> <dc:creator>AffiliateHat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1741</guid> <description>In my case its working for me. I usually post 2 posts a week and i think another crucial factor is making your audience get used to it.Great post</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my case its working for me. I usually post 2 posts a week and i think another crucial factor is making your audience get used to it.</p><p>Great post</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stratos Jets</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1735</link> <dc:creator>Stratos Jets</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:52:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1735</guid> <description>If you post too frequently, you can get banned from blog pinging services too!I think it takes more than once a day, but if you blog more than that be careful. (Microbloggers beware)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you post too frequently, you can get banned from blog pinging services too!</p><p>I think it takes more than once a day, but if you blog more than that be careful. (Microbloggers beware)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Allergy Free Shop</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1733</link> <dc:creator>The Allergy Free Shop</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1733</guid> <description>The search engines sure do love new content! I found the same thing out when I started issuing press releases everyday about the industry I&#039;m in.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The search engines sure do love new content!<br /> I found the same thing out when I started issuing press releases everyday about the industry I&#8217;m in.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tamahome Jenkins</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1723</link> <dc:creator>Tamahome Jenkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:14:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1723</guid> <description>Exactly. As long as you still adhere to the rules of grammar and provide value, filler content most definitely has its place.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. As long as you still adhere to the rules of grammar and provide value, filler content most definitely has its place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1721</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:00:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1721</guid> <description>I&#039;m lucky enough to have never started, but my wife quit about a year ago.  It was an absolute bear for the first couple of days.  Some people are strong enough to slowly cut back, but she found better success with quitting cold turkey.  No doubt it sucks bad for the first couple of days; however, if you can get past them, it&#039;s totally worth it! Are you trying to use anything like gum or the patch?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lucky enough to have never started, but my wife quit about a year ago.  It was an absolute bear for the first couple of days.  Some people are strong enough to slowly cut back, but she found better success with quitting cold turkey.  No doubt it sucks bad for the first couple of days; however, if you can get past them, it&#8217;s totally worth it!<br /> Are you trying to use anything like gum or the patch?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1720</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1720</guid> <description>I found the same thing to be true as well.  Many claim quality content is more important than amount of content, but I don&#039;t agree 100%. Isn&#039;t it strange that &quot;filler&quot; content can bring people as much or more than quality content?  I think it&#039;s because it gives people something to look forward to day in and day out vs. having to wait for new stuff.  It is easier to get into a routine of checking a page daily.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the same thing to be true as well.  Many claim quality content is more important than amount of content, but I don&#8217;t agree 100%.<br /> Isn&#8217;t it strange that &#8220;filler&#8221; content can bring people as much or more than quality content?  I think it&#8217;s because it gives people something to look forward to day in and day out vs. having to wait for new stuff.  It is easier to get into a routine of checking a page daily.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jan_geronimo</title><link>http://propsblog.com/is-your-posting-frequency-working-for-you-or-are-you-working-for-it/#comment-1719</link> <dc:creator>jan_geronimo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:22:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=990#comment-1719</guid> <description>Oh, I&#039;m very successful at it. I have a good record of quitting every day.  Ugh.  Will try harder before it gets me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m very successful at it. I have a good record of quitting every day.  Ugh.  Will try harder before it gets me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/12 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 492/492 objects using disk: basic

Served from: propsblog.com @ 2012-05-18 03:27:53 -->
