<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Think Twice About Who You Put On Your Twitter Lists</title> <atom:link href="http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: 5 Twitter Newbie Mistakes To Avoid To Get You on More Twitter Lists &#124;&#124; Props Blog dot Com</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-699</link> <dc:creator>5 Twitter Newbie Mistakes To Avoid To Get You on More Twitter Lists &#124;&#124; Props Blog dot Com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:02:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-699</guid> <description>[...] Think Twice About Who You Put On Your Twitter Lists  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think Twice About Who You Put On Your Twitter Lists  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-692</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-692</guid> <description>@liz - It&#039;s all good. I had to re-read what I said 2 or 3 times to make sense of it too.Typing like I talk gets me in trouble sometimes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@liz &#8211; It&#8217;s all good. I had to re-read what I said 2 or 3 times to make sense of it too.</p><p>Typing like I talk gets me in trouble sometimes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Liz</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-691</link> <dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:47:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-691</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t read your message that you were going to group talkative people together on one list, I thought you were saying they&#039;d each have their own list. Sorry for the confusion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t read your message that you were going to group talkative people together on one list, I thought you were saying they&#8217;d each have their own list. Sorry for the confusion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-690</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:30:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-690</guid> <description>It would be crazy and pointless to only put a single person on a list.  It would also be pointless to have a list of 150+ people because you just can&#039;t keep in close contact with that many people.I was suggesting putting very active tweeters like Chris Brogan, Guy, and Problogger in the same list and putting people who only tweet 5 or 10 times a day in a list.I think that would provide a nice mix of tweets instead of everyone being drowned out in the noise.Great point about why duplicate lists others have made.  Finding good lists hasn&#039;t been easy so far, but I think when lists are available to everyone, there will be far more lists worth following (thus allowing you to save your lists for... other lists?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be crazy and pointless to only put a single person on a list.  It would also be pointless to have a list of 150+ people because you just can&#8217;t keep in close contact with that many people.</p><p>I was suggesting putting very active tweeters like Chris Brogan, Guy, and Problogger in the same list and putting people who only tweet 5 or 10 times a day in a list.</p><p>I think that would provide a nice mix of tweets instead of everyone being drowned out in the noise.</p><p>Great point about why duplicate lists others have made.  Finding good lists hasn&#8217;t been easy so far, but I think when lists are available to everyone, there will be far more lists worth following (thus allowing you to save your lists for&#8230; other lists?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Liz</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-689</link> <dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:20:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-689</guid> <description>It&#039;s crazy to have a list with just one user on it. You can just go to their profile page &amp; read their Tweets which is the same as a one person list. You only get 20 lists...I&#039;ve already used mine up.Plus, why duplicate lists that someone else has created? I was going to put together of people who work at Twitter (I follow a lot of them) but there are dozens of these lists. It&#039;s easy to follow other people&#039;s lists. I found a great one someone put together of indie music artists on Twitter. Why recreate the wheel?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s crazy to have a list with just one user on it. You can just go to their profile page &amp; read their Tweets which is the same as a one person list. You only get 20 lists&#8230;I&#8217;ve already used mine up.</p><p>Plus, why duplicate lists that someone else has created? I was going to put together of people who work at Twitter (I follow a lot of them) but there are dozens of these lists. It&#8217;s easy to follow other people&#8217;s lists. I found a great one someone put together of indie music artists on Twitter. Why recreate the wheel?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tara</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-686</link> <dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-686</guid> <description>Hi there. I have four Twitter accounts and last week I noticed that one of them had lists enabled so I decided to create one for &quot;Who creative entrepreneurs should follow on Twitter&quot; (Here&#039;s a longer explanation: http://ow.ly/w70l)It&#039;s fine now because there are less than 10 people on it, but I haven&#039;t solved the problem of scale yet.For the problem of noise ... I was using groups in Tweetdeck before there were lists.  Now I&#039;m using Hootsuite and you can create columns for groups, but there is still the problem of noise if you group sqwakers with whisperers.Don&#039;t know yet how to solve that.Thinking ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there. I have four Twitter accounts and last week I noticed that one of them had lists enabled so I decided to create one for &#8220;Who creative entrepreneurs should follow on Twitter&#8221; (Here&#8217;s a longer explanation: <a href="http://ow.ly/w70l">http://ow.ly/w70l</a>)</p><p>It&#8217;s fine now because there are less than 10 people on it, but I haven&#8217;t solved the problem of scale yet.</p><p>For the problem of noise &#8230; I was using groups in Tweetdeck before there were lists.  Now I&#8217;m using Hootsuite and you can create columns for groups, but there is still the problem of noise if you group sqwakers with whisperers.</p><p>Don&#8217;t know yet how to solve that.</p><p>Thinking &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christina Sawyer</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-684</link> <dc:creator>Christina Sawyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:36:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-684</guid> <description>I am not on twitter but it is probably something that can be applied to LOTS of areas!  Kind of a scary though how your name and info gets pulled all around unsolicited.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not on twitter but it is probably something that can be applied to LOTS of areas!  Kind of a scary though how your name and info gets pulled all around unsolicited.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gabe &#124; freebloghelp.com</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-683</link> <dc:creator>Gabe &#124; freebloghelp.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:47:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-683</guid> <description>I haven&#039;t used Lists yet but it&#039;s a good head&#039;s up. For many of us, it&#039;s going to take a little experimenting to get the whole lists thing down to a reasonable noise level.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used Lists yet but it&#8217;s a good head&#8217;s up. For many of us, it&#8217;s going to take a little experimenting to get the whole lists thing down to a reasonable noise level.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake Waddill</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-681</link> <dc:creator>Blake Waddill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-681</guid> <description>That&#039;s a good point Jan!  I started thinking a little more about other uses for Twitter besides content marketing after my last reply.You point further solidifies why I can&#039;t really justify having a huge number of people on a single list.  Unless you&#039;re keeping track of your graduating class or the people who comment on your blog, I just can&#039;t justify having more than 30-40 people on a list.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point Jan!  I started thinking a little more about other uses for Twitter besides content marketing after my last reply.</p><p>You point further solidifies why I can&#8217;t really justify having a huge number of people on a single list.  Unless you&#8217;re keeping track of your graduating class or the people who comment on your blog, I just can&#8217;t justify having more than 30-40 people on a list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pallab</title><link>http://propsblog.com/think-twice-about-who-you-put-on-your-twitter-list/#comment-680</link> <dc:creator>Pallab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:32:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://propsblog.com/?p=684#comment-680</guid> <description>It seems twitter has decided to expand its Lists beta. I also got access to Lists today.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems twitter has decided to expand its Lists beta. I also got access to Lists today.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/12 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 492/492 objects using disk: basic

Served from: propsblog.com @ 2012-05-18 04:10:31 -->
